87c8b70e7b
Currently the check_example in test_functional computes sums and on error tells the developer the difference in sums, which is confusing and error prone. It also leads to false positives where sums may be correct, but the exact number of MEDIUM, HIGH, etc is different. This was the case for two tests: test_xml and test_secret_config_option. The general_hardcoded_password test was also broken for py35 because it was assuming function args are ast.Name not ast.arg. But surprisingly the tests passed because of a syntax error in the example. Change-Id: Icd06fb7ca27a8a01d6442f199775d474d436371b
25 lines
474 B
Python
25 lines
474 B
Python
def someFunction(user, password="Admin"):
|
|
print("Hi " + user)
|
|
|
|
def someFunction2(password):
|
|
if password == "root":
|
|
print("OK, logged in")
|
|
|
|
def noMatch(password):
|
|
if password == '':
|
|
print("No password!")
|
|
|
|
def NoMatch2(password):
|
|
if password == "ajklawejrkl42348swfgkg":
|
|
print("Nice password!")
|
|
|
|
def doLogin(password="blerg"):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
def NoMatch3(a, b):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
doLogin(password="blerg")
|
|
password = "blerg"
|
|
d["password"] = "blerg"
|