Change the wording from destroy to delete
Change-Id: I9a818170e902986436733f103526644ace705572
This commit is contained in:
parent
884d8b2acb
commit
734ca6d0e3
@ -231,12 +231,12 @@ Extras
|
||||
~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
You can detach the volume and reattach it elsewhere, or use the following
|
||||
steps to destroy the volume.
|
||||
steps to delete the volume.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
The following operations are destructive and result in data loss.
|
||||
|
||||
To detach and destroy a volume:
|
||||
To detach and delete a volume:
|
||||
|
||||
.. only:: libcloud
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ robust, application.
|
||||
|
||||
The second application is an OpenStack application that enables you to:
|
||||
|
||||
* Create and destroy compute resources. These resources are virtual
|
||||
* Create and delete compute resources. These resources are virtual
|
||||
machine instances where the Fractals application runs.
|
||||
* Make cloud-related architecture decisions such as turning
|
||||
functions into micro-services and modularizing them.
|
||||
@ -1008,7 +1008,7 @@ section.
|
||||
Deploy the application to a new instance
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Now that you know how to create and destroy instances, you can deploy the
|
||||
Now that you know how to create and delete instances, you can deploy the
|
||||
sample application. The instance that you create for the application is
|
||||
similar to the first instance that you created, but this time, we'll briefly
|
||||
introduce a few extra concepts.
|
||||
@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ introduce a few extra concepts.
|
||||
|
||||
When you create an instance for the application, you'll want to give it a bit
|
||||
more information than you supplied to the bare instance that you just created
|
||||
and destroyed. We'll go into more detail in later sections, but for now,
|
||||
and deleted. We'll go into more detail in later sections, but for now,
|
||||
simply create the following resources so that you can feed them to the
|
||||
instance:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ that this feature can bring, as compared to traditional
|
||||
infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, just having access to additional resources is only part of
|
||||
the battle; while it's certainly possible to manually add or destroy
|
||||
the battle; while it's certainly possible to manually add or delete
|
||||
resources, you'll get more value -- and more responsiveness -- if the
|
||||
application simply requests new resources automatically when it needs
|
||||
them.
|
||||
@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ redundant web services. If one dies, the others can be used.
|
||||
corresponding Floating IPs. Replace FRACTAL_UUID the UUID
|
||||
of an existing fractal.
|
||||
|
||||
Go ahead and test the fault tolerance. Start destroying workers and API
|
||||
Go ahead and test the fault tolerance. Start deleting workers and API
|
||||
instances. As long as you have one of each, your application should
|
||||
be fine. There is one weak point though. The database contains the
|
||||
fractals and fractal metadata. If you lose that instance, the
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user