
This is a first iteration over the guide to update obvious places for the transition from OpenStack infrastructure to OpenDev. Change-Id: I723c680b7a9eddd80969ff00ccfe499e10222551
27 KiB
- title
-
Project Driver's Guide
Project Driver's Guide
Feature Branches
There are times when prolonged development on specific features is easier on a feature branch rather than on master. In particular it organizes work to a location that interested parties can follow. Feature branches also move merge points to specific points in time rather than at every proposed change. Learn more about feature branches in the project team guide.
For projects under governance, new feature branches can be requested
using the same mechanism as stable branch creation. Submit a patch to
the releases repository with a new feature/feature-name
branch defined. Set the location value to the repository and commit hash
from which to branch:
---
branches:
- name: feature/example-feature-work
location:
openstack/oslo.config: 02a86d2eefeda5144ea8c39657aed24b8b0c9a39
For more details, refer to the openstack/releases README.rst file.
For projects not under governance, new branches can be defined via Gerrit. In the Gerrit UI, under Projects > List, locate the given project and go to the Branches option. For example:
https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/projects/openstack/nova,branches
If you do not have the option to add a new branch, you will need to contact the infra team to get the necessary permissions for the project.
If more than one project is involved in a feature development effort, the same feature branch name should be used across all involved projects. This will cause integration testing with Zuul to use the respective feature branch from any project that carries it. Projects without an equivalently named feature branch will use master instead. Use care not to create a feature branch with the same name as a feature branch for an unrelated effort in another project.
One additional thing to keep in mind is that feature branches should be treated like master in most cases. They are specifically not for sustained long term development like stable branches.
Merge Commits
An important activity when using feature branches is syncing to and from the project's master branch. During development on a feature branch a project will want to merge master into the feature branch periodically to keep up to date with changes over time. Then when development on the feature branch is complete, it will need to be merged into master.
Before this can happen the project team's release group will need to have access to push merge commits in Gerrit:
[access "refs/for/refs/*"]
pushMerge = group <projectname>-release
Should be added to the project's ACL file in the project-config repo.
Merge Master into Feature Branch
git remote update
git checkout feature-branch
git pull --ff-only origin feature-branch
git checkout -b merge-branch
git merge origin/master
# Amend the merge commit to automatically add a Change-ID to the commit message
GIT_EDITOR=/bin/true git commit --amend
git review -R feature-branch
git checkout master
git branch -D merge-branch
Merge Feature Branch into Master
git remote update
git checkout master
git pull --ff-only origin master
git checkout -b merge-branch
# Force a merge commit by not fast-forwarding, in case master hasn't updated:
git merge --no-ff origin/feature-branch
# Amend the merge commit to automatically add a Change-ID to the commit message:
GIT_EDITOR=/bin/true git commit --amend
git review -R
git checkout master
git branch -D merge-branch
How To Avoid Merging Specific Files
Sometimes you may have files on one branch you don't want merged to
or from another. An easy workaround for this is to checkout the file in
question from the target branch and amend your merge commit before
pushing it for review. For example, as in the last section you've just
merged from origin/feature-branch
into your local
merge-branch
but want to keep the .gitreview
file from master
because you don't want
defaultbranch=feature-branch
added to it. Immediately
before you git commit --amend
do:
git checkout origin/master -- .gitreview
Release Management
This section describes topics related to release management.
Release and stable branches
Projects following the release:cycle-with-milestones model generate release candidates before the final release to encourage 3rd-party testing. The first release candidate (RC1) is cut from the master branch. You can learn more about release management in the project team guide.
Between RC1 and the final release, there needs to be a separate branch in Gerrit for release-critical changes destined for the final release. Meanwhile, development on the master branch should continue as normal (with the addition that changes proposed for the final release should also be proposed for master, and some changes for master may need to be applied to the release branch).
In order to avoid tracking different branches pre- and post-release, this process directly creates a stable/<series> (for example, stable/mitaka) branch that will be reused as the stable maintenance branch post-release. Specific ACLs apply to the branch pre-release, and when the final release is tagged the generic stable branch ACLs are applied instead.
Create stable/* Branch
For OpenStack projects this should be performed by the OpenStack Release Management Team at the Release Branch Point. If you are managing branches for your project you may have permission to do this yourself.
- Go to https://review.opendev.org/ and sign in
- Select 'Admin', 'Projects', then the project
- Select 'Branches'
- Enter
stable/<series>
in the 'Branch Name' field, andHEAD
as the 'Initial Revision', then press 'Create Branch'. Alternatively, you may rungit branch stable/<series> <sha> && git push gerrit stable/<series>
Once this is done, you should push a change updating the defaultbranch in .gitreview to match the new name of the branch, so that "git review" automatically pushes to the right branch:
defaultbranch=stable/<series>
To check out the new branch in your local checkout, you can use:
git checkout master
git pull
git checkout stable/<series>
Authoring Changes for stable/*
Create topic branches as normal, but branch them from stable/* rather than master:
git checkout stable/<series>
git pull
git checkout -b <topic branch>
Generally the defaultbranch in .gitreview is adjusted on the new
branch so that you can directly use git review
. If not,
changes for stable/* should be submitted with:
git review stable/<series>
Submit Changes in master to stable/*
If a change to master should also be included in stable/*, use this procedure to cherry-pick that change and submit it for review:
git checkout stable/<series>
git pull
git checkout -b master-to-mp
git cherry-pick -x <SHA1 or "master">
git review stable/<series>
git checkout master
git branch -D master-to-mp
git cherry-pick master
will pick the most recent commit
from master to apply, if you want a different patch, use the SHA1 of the
commit instead.
The -x
flag will ensure the commit message records the
SHA1 hash of the original commit in master.
If there are conflicts when cherry-picking, do not delete the 'Conflicts' lines git adds to the commit message. These are valuable to reviewers to identify files which need extra attention.
You can learn more about stable branches in the project team guide.
Tagging a Release
Deliverables produced by official teams and released following the release cycle should be managed by the OpenStack Release Management Team. See the instructions in the README.rst in openstack/releases for details.
If you are managing your own releases, you may have permission to do this yourself.
Tag the tip of the appropriate branch (stable/<series> for server projects using release candidates, master for the others) with a release tag and push that tag to Gerrit by running the following commands:
git checkout <branch name>
git pull --ff-only
git tag -s <version number>
git push gerrit <version number>
Note
Pushing the tag will trigger the release pipeline in zuul, but without proper configuration no release will happen. A publishing job is required. One common way to do this is to use a publish-to-pypi template in openstack/project-config. The publishing jobs are one of the
central-config-exceptions
.Tags can't be effectively deleted once pushed, so make absolutely certain they're correct (ideally by locally testing release artifact generation commands and inspecting the results between the tag and push steps above).
Git won't have a remote named gerrit until the first time git-review runs. You may need to run
git review -s
before the push.The -s option to git tag signs the tag using GnuPG, so it's important to ensure that the person making the release has a suitable OpenPGP key.
Make sure you're only adding a single tag when pushing to gerrit, like in the example above.
After a tag is created the release build will generate a source code tarball and may publish it to a repository such as PyPI.
Tags need to follow the format of
440
which consists for final releases of one or more non-negative integer values, separated by dots. Be aware thatpbr
needs a three component version, like1.0.0
or1.2.3
.If you need to support other version schemes, you might need to use the
tag
pipeline instead of the defaultrelease
pipeline. Best discuss this with the OpenDev team.
Gerrit IRC Notifications
The intent of this section is to detail how to set up notifications about all the projects that are hosted on OpenDev Gerrit in the appropriate IRC channels.
GerritBot is an IRC bot that listens to the OpenDev Gerrit server for events and notifies those on Freenode's channels.
GerritBot is able to notify the channel for events like creation of patchsets, changes merged, comments added to patchsets and updates to refs. These event notifications can be configured per project, so the channel can have multiple notifications per project.
Before you can configure GerritBot, you need to give channel
permissions with an accessbot configuration specific to the channel
where you want notifications posted. The configuration file is hosted in
openstack/project-config.
Edit accessbot/channels.yaml
to add your IRC channel if it
is not already listed.
In order for GerritBot to post notifications on the IRC channel of
the project you are configuring, you need to add your GerritBot
configuration into gerritbot/channels.yaml
. This file is
hosted in openstack/project-config.
The syntax for configuring the notifications is:
<IRC channel>:
events:
- patchset-created
- change-merged
- comment-added
- ref-updated
projects:
- <project name>
branches:
- <branch name>
Please note that the text between the angle brackets are placeholder values. Multiple projects and branches can be listed in the YAML file.
Running Jobs with Zuul
Those looking to write and run jobs with Zuul can refer to Zuul's documentation in order to get started.
Retiring a Project
If you need to retire a project and no longer accept patches, it is important to communicate that to both users and contributors. The following steps will help you wind down a project gracefully.
Note
The following sections are really separate steps. If your project has jobs set up and is an official project, you need to submit four different changes as explained below. We recommend to link these changes with "Depends-On:" and "Needed-By:" headers.
Prerequirement: Announce Retirement
Use mailing lists or other channels to announce to users and contributors that the project is being retired. Be sure to include a date upon which maintenance will end, if that date is in the future.
Step 1: Stop requirements syncing (if set up)
Submit a review to the openstack/requirements
project
removing the project from projects.txt
. This needs to
happen for stable branches as well.
Step 2: End Project Gating
Check out a copy of the openstack/project-config
repository and edit zuul.d/projects.yaml
. Find the section
for your project and change it to look like this:
- project:
name: <namespace>/<projectname>
templates:
- noop-jobs
Also, remove any jobs and templates you have defined. These can be
defined in openstack/project-config
repository in the
directory zuul.d
, or in
openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs
repository or in your own
repository.
Submit that change and make sure to mention in the commit message that you are ending project gating for the purposes of retiring the project. Wait for that change to merge and then proceed.
Step 3: Remove Project Content
Once Zuul is no longer running tests on your project, prepare a
change that removes all of the files from your project except the
README. Double check that all dot files (such as .gitignore
and .testr.conf
) except
.gitreview
are also removed.
Note
Removing the .gitreview
file from the master branch of a
repository breaks much of the OpenStack release tools, so it will be
harder to continue to tag releases on existing stable branches. Take
care to remove all files other than README.rst
and
.gitreview
.
Replace the contents of the README with a message such as this:
This project is no longer maintained.
The contents of this repository are still available in the Git
source code management system. To see the contents of this
repository before it reached its end of life, please check out the
previous commit with "git checkout HEAD^1".
(Optional:)
For an alternative project, please see <alternative project name> at
<alternative project URL>.
For any further questions, please email
openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org or join #openstack-dev on
Freenode.
Merge this commit to your project.
If any users missed the announcement that the project is being retired, removing the content of the repository will cause any users who continuously deploy the software as well as users who track changes to the repository to notice the retirement. While this may be disruptive, it is generally considered better than continuing to deploy unmaintained software. Potential contributors who may not have otherwise read the README will in this case, as it is the only file in the repository.
Step 4: Remove Project from Infrastructure Systems
Once your repository is in its final state, prepare a second change
to the openstack/project-config
repository that does the
following:
Remove your project from
zuul.d/projects.yaml
andzuul/main.yaml
.By default, project ACLs are defined in a file called
gerrit/acls/<namespace>/<projectname>.config
. If this file exists, remove it.Now adjust the project configuration and use the shared read-only ACLs. Find the entry for your project in
gerrit/projects.yaml
and look for the line which defines the acl-config, update or add it so that it contents is:acl-config: /home/gerrit2/acls/openstack/retired.config
Also prefix the project description with
RETIRED,
:description: RETIRED, existing project description
Remove your project from
gerritbot/channels.yaml
.
Note
If there is a need to unretire a project, most steps here can be done in reverse. This step has some caveats to be aware of when going in reverse.
With the removal of ACLs from the Gerrit project, the project gets marked as read-only. Adding those ACLs back to the configuration files does not switch it back to read-write. Manual intervention will be required from the infra team to restore the project status back to "Active" in Gerrit before ACLs can be reapplied successfully.
Step 5: Remove Repository from the Governance Repository
If this was an official OpenStack project, remove it from the
reference/projects.yaml
file and add it to the file
reference/legacy.yaml
in the
openstack/governance
repository. Note that if the project
was recently active, this may have implications for automatic detection
of ATCs.
Package Requirements
The OpenDev infrastructure sets up nodes for testing that contain a minimal system and a number of convenience distribution packages.
If you want to add additional packages, you have several options.
If you run Python tests using tox
, you can install them
using requirements.txt
and
test-requirements.txt
files (for OpenStack projects, see
also the global
requirements process). If these Python tests need additional
distribution packages installed as well and if those are not in the
nodes used for testing, they have to be installed explicitly.
If you are building documentation, the file
doc/requirements.txt
is used instead to install Python
packages.
If you run devstack based tests, then list missing binary packages below the files directory of devstack.
For non-devstack based tests, add a bindep.txt
file
containing listing the required distribution packages. It is a
cross-platform list of all dependencies needed for running tests. The bindep utility will
be used to install the right dependencies per distribution when running
in the OpenDev infrastructure.
If you use bindep, create a bindep tox environment as well:
[testenv:bindep]
# Do not install any requirements. We want this to be fast and work even if
# system dependencies are missing, since it's used to tell you what system
# dependencies are missing! This also means that bindep must be installed
# separately, outside of the requirements files.
deps = bindep
commands = bindep test
This way a developer can just run bindep to get a list of missing packages for their own system:
$ tox -e bindep
The output of this can then be fed into the distribution package
manager like apt-get
, dnf
, yum
,
or zypper
to install missing binary packages.
The OpenDev infrastructure will install packages marked for a profile
named "test" along with any packages belonging to the default profile of
the bindep.txt
file. Add any build time requirements and
any requirements specific to the test jobs to the "test" profile, add
any requirements specific to documentation building to the "doc"
profile, add requirements for test, runtime, and documentation to the
base profile:
# A runtime dependency
libffi6
# A build time dependency
libffi-devel [test]
# A documentation dependency
graphviz [doc]
Submodules
The use of git submodules is not supported. The tools that we use do not all work correctly with submodules and we have found that submodules can be very confusing even for experienced developers. If your project depends on another project, please express that as an external dependency on a released package (i.e., through requirements.txt, bindep.txt, or similar mechanism).
Unit Test Set up
Projects might need special set up for unit tests which can be done
via the script tools/test-setup.sh
that needs to reside in
the repository.
Python unit tests are tests like coverage
,
python27
, python35
, and pypy
which are run using python's tox
package as well as tests
using the template openstack-tox-{envlist}
or
tox-{envlist}
. For these tests, the script
tools/test-setup.sh
is run if it exists in the repository
and is executable after package installation. The script has
sudo
access and can set up the test environment as needed.
For example, it should be used to set up the
openstack_citest
databases for testing.
Consistent Naming for Zuul Jobs
This document describes a consistent naming scheme for Zuul jobs. The goal is to give job developer and reviewers of jobs a common document as reference. This is particularly important because all jobs within a Zuul tenant share a common global namespace. Adhering to these guidelines avoids collisions between jobs defined in various repositories within a Zuul tenant.
Warning
This is a living document, it may get updates as our use of Zuul changes over time.
Job Naming Scheme
The general pattern is
{prefix-}MAINPURPOSE-DETAILS{-}{node}
.Jobs in specific pipelines have no special prefix, there's no need to use
gate-
orperiodic
as it was done with Zuul v2.There is in general no need to give the name of the repository as part of the job as it was done with Zuul v2, unless the job is defined in a specific repo.
Publishing jobs, like documentation or tarball uploads, have a prefix of
publish
likepublish-tarball
andpublish-sphinx-docs
.These jobs are normally run in a post pipeline.
Jobs that build an artifact without uploading
build
likebuild-sphinx-docs
.Jobs have the optional suffixes
{node}
which is used when a test should be run on different platforms like on CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE, or Ubuntu - or on different versions of these. For jobs that are only run on one platform, the suffix{node}
should be avoided. The suffix{node}
is the name for the node the job runs on. If this is a a multi-node job, it's the name of the underlying single node.Use consistent names like "integration", "functional", "rally", "tempest", "grenade", "devstack" (what do we need? Those should be explained) as
MAINPURPOSE
.Components of job names are separated by
-
.Do not use "." for versions, just cat them together like
35
for Python 3.5.Since Zuul allows overriding of job and definition of jobs, care should be taken not to use the same name for different jobs:
- If you override a generic Zuul job for project specific usage prefix
it with
PROJECT-
. For example, OpenStack creates versions of generic jobs intended to be used globally within OpenStack and prefixes them withopenstack-
. - If you define a job in a specific repo, the name of the job should
use the repository name as
prefix
or as first part of it.
- If you override a generic Zuul job for project specific usage prefix
it with
Examples of job names using these rules:
- tox-py27 or openstack-py27
- tox-py35 or openstack-py35
- grenade-neutron-forward
- neutron-api (or neutron-api-ubuntu-xenial if multiple OSes need to be tested)
- tempest-neutron-full-ssh
- build-sphinx-docs
- publish-sphinx-docs
Outbound Third-Party Testing
Many organizations generously donate cloud computing resources to the OpenStack project for use by its testing and automation system so that we can maintain and improve the quality of our software. We are stewards of these resources and strive to use them wisely and responsibly.
These resources are available to perform integration testing with Open-Source projects which are direct dependencies or direct downstream consumers of official OpenStack projects. If you want to set up an integration test with a non-OpenStack project that meets these criteria, follow the instructions below.
Currently, Zuul is able to report on changes proposed to Gerrit systems or GitHub. If the project you want to test with isn't hosted on a Gerrit or GitHub, contact the infrastructure team in #openstack-infra to discuss options.
In all cases, before starting this process, be sure you have discussed this with the team responsible for the project you want to test. You should get their approval to report test results on changes or pull-requests.
Hosted on an External Gerrit
If the project you wish to test is hosted on a Gerrit system (other than OpenStack's Gerrit), you may need to connect Zuul to it first, if it isn't already. To do so, propose a change to system-config which adds the connection information for the new server, then work with the infra team in #openstack-infra to set up an account.
Once this is complete, propose a change to add the project(s) to OpenStack's Zuul. Add them to project-config/zuul/main.yaml under the connection name established above.
The project should not be configured to load any configuration
objects (i.e., it should have an include: []
stanza
associated with it).
Hosted on GitHub
If the project you wish to test is hosted on GitHub, ask the team managing the project to install the "OpenStack Zuul" App into the project (or organization if multiple projects are involved).
Visit the OpenStack Zuul App page on GitHub and click the Configure button to install the app.
Once this is complete, propose a change to add the project(s) to
OpenStack's Zuul. Add them to project-config/zuul/main.yaml
under the github:
connection.
The project should not be configured to load any configuration
objects (i.e., it should have an include: []
stanza
associated with it).
Add to Pipelines
Once Zuul is configured to know about the project, it can be added to
pipelines just like any other project in Zuul. However, external
projects should only be added to the third-party-check
pipeline. Because we are not loading any in-tree configuration from
these projects, this needs to be done in the project-config repo. Define the jobs you wish
to run either in your own repos, or in openstack-zuul-jobs. Then create project
definitions for the new projects in project-config/zuul.d/projects.yaml
which adds those jobs to the new project on the third-party-check pipeline.