opendev/git-review
Code Issues Proposed changes

manpage minor fixes with no output changes

Browse Source 
as shown by `groff -mdoc git-review.1`

* avoid warnings about empty input lines
* avoid warnings about .Bd not having a matching .Ed

Change-Id: Iba775f72f2ac7c6f694d2b89165fed27984641f3
This commit is contained in:
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon 2012-10-25 23:17:42 -07:00
parent 10a65f4632
commit a8945b8979
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
git-review.1
View File

@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Submit review as a draft. Requires Gerrit 2.3 or newer.
.It Fl R , Fl -no-rebase
Do not automatically perform a rebase before submitting the change to
Gerrit.
.Pp
When submitting a change for review, you will usually want it to be based on the tip of upstream branch in order to avoid possible conflicts. When amending a change and rebasing the new patchset, the Gerrit web interface will show a difference between the two patchsets which contains all commits in between. This may confuse many reviewers that would expect to see a much simpler difference.
.It Fl -version
Print the version number and exit.
@ -106,10 +106,11 @@ project=department/project.git
defaultbranch=master
defaultremote=review
defaultrebase=0
.Ed
.Pp
.Sh EXAMPLES
To fetch a remote change number 3004:
.Pp
.Bd -literal -offset indent
$ git-review -d 3004
Downloading refs/changes/04/3004/1 from gerrit into
@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ $ git branch
master
* review/author/topic_name
.Ed
.Pp
Gerrit looks up both name of the author and the topic name from Gerrit
to name a local branch. This facilitates easier identification of changes.
.Pp